OVI / DUI ‘Per Se’ Defenses In Ohio
Defenses For Accusations Of DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ In Ohio
In Ohio, it is per se (“by itself”) illegal to operate a vehicle with a prohibited concentration of alcohol and/or drugs in the driver’s breath, blood or urine. If a driver’s alcohol or drug level is ‘over the limit’ while operating a vehicle, the driver is guilty of DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’, even if the alcohol and/or drug(s) did not impair the driver’s ability to operate the vehicle.
To prove the driver’s alcohol and/or drug level was ‘over the limit’, the prosecution will introduce the results of a breath test, blood test, or urine test. The defenses to DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ generally aim to exclude the test results from evidence or explain why the test results were inaccurate.
Top 50 Defenses To DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ In Ohio
The Dominy Law Firm lawyers represent clients charged with DUI / OVI in Columbus and Central Ohio. Our lawyers developed The Top 100 Ohio DUI / OVI Defenses ©: a list of the top, but not all, defenses. Half of those defenses relate to the charge of DUI / OVI ‘Impaired’, and half of those defenses relate to the charge of DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’. Some of the defenses for ‘Per Se’ charges are asserted in cases involving breath tests, some of the defenses are used in cases involving blood/urine tests, and some defenses apply to all three types of tests. The top 50 defenses for DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ are listed below.
Breath Tests
- Test result does not prove BAC was ‘over the limit’ at the time of operating the vehicle due to rising BAC
- Driver’s breath temperature was not measured, and breath temperature changes result of test
- Driver’s breathing pattern affected test result
- Cell phone in area of breath test caused radio frequency interference
- Breath-testing machine plugged into outlet with other electrical devices
- Driver had foreign substance in mouth at time of breath test
- Medical condition affected accuracy of test
- Ambient air contained alcohol which inflated test result
- Breath-testing machine not properly maintained
- Officer did not conduct 20-minute observation period before test
- Invalid sample not followed by 20-minute observation period
- Records for breath-testing machine not maintained for three years
- Instrument check not performed every seven days
- Instrument check did not yield valid result
- Radio frequency interference check not performed every seven days
- Instrument check solution used beyond expiration date
- Instrument check solution not refrigerated when not in use
- Instrument check solution container not retained for prescribed period
- Breath test operator did not have valid permit
- Breath-testing machine senior operator for maintenance did not have valid permit
- Breath-testing machine not in proper working order
Blood & Urine Tests
- No search warrant and no exception to search warrant requirement
- Defective search warrant
- Procedure manual for test not on file in analytical testing area
- Procedures used by laboratory not scientifically valid
- Procedures for analytical testing not followed
- Technique used for testing not approved by Ohio Department of Health
- Instrument(s) used for testing were not calibrated daily
- Instrument(s) used for testing failed calibration
- Laboratory records not maintained for prescribed period
- Sample not refrigerated when not in transit
- Sample not sealed and labeled as required by Ohio Department of Health
- Chain of custody for sample not properly documented and retained
- Sample not retained for additional testing
- Laboratory did not successfully complete national proficiency testing program
- Analyst did not have a valid laboratory technician or director permit
- Laboratory report inadequate
- Medical condition affected result of test
- Medication affected result of test
- Analyst error in testing sequence
- Instrument used for testing has internal contamination
- Balance instruments not calibrated
- Internal standards, standards, and controls invalid
- Uncertainty in measurement not calculated
- Mass spectrometer spectral library used for confirmation invalid
- Blood draw not conducted by qualified individual
- Blood draw not conducted with sterile dry needle into vacuum container
- Blood collected in container without solid anticoagulant
- Urine sample not collected in accordance with Ohio regulations
- Urine alcohol level at time of operating vehicle was below the ‘legal limit’ due to pooling of alcohol in urine
Law Firm For DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ Cases
The lawyers at the Dominy Law Firm understand how to present defenses related to DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’. If you are seeking representation for this type of case in Columbus or Central Ohio, a free phone consultation can be arranged by completing a CONTACT FORM or by calling our office at 614-717-1177.